* [PATCH NF_CONNTRACK 8/9]: zero-clear union area in tuple for expectant
@ 2005-05-23 6:23 Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
2005-06-11 15:36 ` Patrick McHardy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yasuyuki KOZAKAI @ 2005-05-23 6:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kaber; +Cc: netfilter-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 253 bytes --]
This patch clears union area in tuple for expectant.
Signed-off-by: Yasuyuki Kozakai <yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Yasuyuki Kozakai @ USAGI Project <yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp>
[-- Attachment #2: 08-expect.patch --]
[-- Type: Text/Plain, Size: 556 bytes --]
diff -Nur linux-2.6.12-rc4-nfct-7-nat-seq/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c linux-2.6.12-rc4-nfct-8-expect/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
--- linux-2.6.12-rc4-nfct-7-nat-seq/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c 2005-05-20 03:18:29.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc4-nfct-8-expect/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c 2005-05-20 03:16:23.000000000 +0900
@@ -987,6 +987,8 @@
DEBUGP("expect_related: OOM allocating expect\n");
return NULL;
}
+ NF_CT_TUPLE_U_BLANK(&new->tuple);
+ NF_CT_TUPLE_U_BLANK(&new->mask);
new->master = NULL;
return new;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH NF_CONNTRACK 8/9]: zero-clear union area in tuple for expectant 2005-05-23 6:23 [PATCH NF_CONNTRACK 8/9]: zero-clear union area in tuple for expectant Yasuyuki KOZAKAI @ 2005-06-11 15:36 ` Patrick McHardy 2005-06-15 4:05 ` Yasuyuki KOZAKAI 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Patrick McHardy @ 2005-06-11 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yasuyuki KOZAKAI; +Cc: netfilter-devel Yasuyuki KOZAKAI wrote: > This patch clears union area in tuple for expectant. Why is this necessary? The helpers should initialize tuple and mask. Regards Patrick > diff -Nur linux-2.6.12-rc4-nfct-7-nat-seq/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c linux-2.6.12-rc4-nfct-8-expect/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c > --- linux-2.6.12-rc4-nfct-7-nat-seq/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c 2005-05-20 03:18:29.000000000 +0900 > +++ linux-2.6.12-rc4-nfct-8-expect/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c 2005-05-20 03:16:23.000000000 +0900 > @@ -987,6 +987,8 @@ > DEBUGP("expect_related: OOM allocating expect\n"); > return NULL; > } > + NF_CT_TUPLE_U_BLANK(&new->tuple); > + NF_CT_TUPLE_U_BLANK(&new->mask); > new->master = NULL; > return new; > } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH NF_CONNTRACK 8/9]: zero-clear union area in tuple for expectant 2005-06-11 15:36 ` Patrick McHardy @ 2005-06-15 4:05 ` Yasuyuki KOZAKAI 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Yasuyuki KOZAKAI @ 2005-06-15 4:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kaber; +Cc: netfilter-devel, yasuyuki.kozakai [-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 425 bytes --] From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:36:44 +0200 > Yasuyuki KOZAKAI wrote: > > This patch clears union area in tuple for expectant. > > Why is this necessary? The helpers should initialize tuple and mask. OK, please apply this patch instead of it. Regards, ----------------------------------------------------------------- Yasuyuki Kozakai @ USAGI Project <yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp> [-- Attachment #2: exp-tuple-init.patch --] [-- Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1564 bytes --] Index: net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ftp.c =================================================================== --- 9f4386a4dd0fa00c434d7acc6b8bc3de43e60a3b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ftp.c (mode:100644) +++ uncommitted/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ftp.c (mode:100644) @@ -565,28 +565,29 @@ sizeof(exp->tuple.dst.u3)); } + exp->tuple.src.u3 = ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.src.u3; + exp->tuple.src.l3num = cmd.l3num; + exp->tuple.src.u.tcp.port = 0; + exp->tuple.dst.u.tcp.port = cmd.u.tcp.port; + exp->tuple.dst.protonum = IPPROTO_TCP; + + exp->mask = (struct nf_conntrack_tuple) + { .src = { .l3num = 0xFFFF, + .u = { .tcp = { 0 }}, + }, + .dst = { .protonum = 0xFF, + .u = { .tcp = { 0xFFFF }}, + }, + }; if (cmd.l3num == PF_INET) { - exp->tuple.src.u3.ip = ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.src.u3.ip; exp->mask.src.u3.ip = 0xFFFFFFFF; exp->mask.dst.u3.ip = 0xFFFFFFFF; } else { - memcpy(exp->tuple.src.u3.ip6, - ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.src.u3.ip6, - sizeof(exp->tuple.src.u3.ip6)); memset(exp->mask.src.u3.ip6, 0xFF, sizeof(exp->mask.src.u3.ip6)); memset(exp->mask.dst.u3.ip6, 0xFF, sizeof(exp->mask.src.u3.ip6)); } - exp->tuple.src.l3num = cmd.l3num; - exp->tuple.src.u.tcp.port = 0; - exp->tuple.dst.u.tcp.port = cmd.u.tcp.port; - exp->tuple.dst.protonum = IPPROTO_TCP; - - exp->mask.src.l3num = 0xFFFF; - exp->mask.src.u.tcp.port = 0; - exp->mask.dst.u.tcp.port = 0xFFFF; - exp->mask.dst.protonum = 0xFF; exp->expectfn = NULL; exp->master = ct; ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-15 4:05 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-05-23 6:23 [PATCH NF_CONNTRACK 8/9]: zero-clear union area in tuple for expectant Yasuyuki KOZAKAI 2005-06-11 15:36 ` Patrick McHardy 2005-06-15 4:05 ` Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.