From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [Patch] ip{, 6}tables-restore -n with existing user defined chain Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 15:38:14 +0200 Message-ID: <42AC3AC6.4080304@trash.net> References: <42AB0D81.2080804@trash.net> <20050612095655.GB19830@obroa-skai.de.gnumonks.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Harald Welte In-Reply-To: <20050612095655.GB19830@obroa-skai.de.gnumonks.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Harald Welte wrote: > It seems fine to me, but we alwasy need to be cautious with silently > changing semantics that people might rely on... > > but please apply... Thanks for your feedback. Charlie, your patch doesn't apply, apparently because of whitespace issues: patching file ip6tables-restore.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 233. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file ip6tables-restore.c.rej patching file iptables-restore.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 236. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file iptables-restore.c.rej Please resend as attachment. Regards Patrick