From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DhY8R-0003wX-Bz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 15:28:43 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DhY8O-0003vR-WC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 15:28:41 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhY8O-0003to-ST for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 15:28:40 -0400 Received: from [80.202.4.58] (helo=osl1smout1.broadpark.no) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DhY7C-0007h7-OT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 15:27:26 -0400 Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IHZ00E1BKOIMN50@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:26:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.0.0.5] ([80.202.16.196]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IHZ00MAMKU9MYE0@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:30:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:27:08 +0200 From: Helge Hafting Message-id: <42AC8C8C.1040400@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: [Qemu-devel] Is there a public cvs for qemu? I have a problem with 0.7.0 Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Some posts mentions cvs, but I couldn't find info about any public cvs, so I wonder if there is one. Read access is all I need. One of the stated goals is to improve correctness, and I hope that eventually will solve a problem I have. I have a single windows program that I need to run (linux host), but it always fails in one way or another: * win98: fast compared to xp, but lots of crashes and no networking. *windows xp pro: much slower, but also better. The program (written in VB) works flawlessly except for a crash when trying to print. Unfortunately, printing is one of its main uses. I have tried lots of tips from the developer, including reinstalls, SP1, SP2 and different printer drivers. So it seems to be a problem with the emulated machine somehow. I don't use the acceleration stuff, the program is light and fast enough. Getting it to work is the important point. Helge Hafting