From: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Grant Coady <grant_lkml@dodo.com.au>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6?
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 19:01:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42ADBBE0.1030901@rainbow-software.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1118675343.13773.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2005-06-13 at 15:06, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>>>Make sure you have pre-empt disabled and the antcipatory I/O scheduler
>>>disabled.
>>>
>>
>>I don't think that those could explain it.
>
>
> Try it and see. The anticipatory I/O scheduler does horrible things to
> my IDE streaming performance numbers and to swap performance. It tries
> to merge I/O by delaying it which is deeply ungood when it comes to IDE
> streaming even if its good for general I/O.
Changing the scheduler did not help (the results are about the same with
any of the 4 schedulers). Read ahead is already set to 256 (increasing
to 1024 did not help either). Kernel compilation takes too much time
here so I didn't test with preempt disabled.
The drive is WD300BB (7200RPM) in UDMA2 mode.
root@pentium:~# cat /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler
noop anticipatory [deadline] cfq
root@pentium:~# hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 176 MB in 2.00 seconds = 88.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 34 MB in 3.02 seconds = 11.26 MB/sec
root@pentium:~# hdparm /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
multcount = 16 (on)
IO_support = 1 (32-bit)
unmaskirq = 1 (on)
using_dma = 1 (on)
keepsettings = 1 (on)
readonly = 0 (off)
readahead = 256 (on)
geometry = 58168/16/63, sectors = 58633344, start = 0
--
Ondrej Zary
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-13 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-13 4:03 Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6? Grant Coady
2005-06-13 10:43 ` Ondrej Zary
2005-06-13 13:39 ` Alan Cox
2005-06-13 14:06 ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-13 15:09 ` Alan Cox
2005-06-13 17:01 ` Ondrej Zary [this message]
2005-06-13 20:25 ` Jens Axboe
2005-06-14 2:20 ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-15 19:15 ` Ondrej Zary
2005-06-17 12:40 ` Alan Cox
2005-06-17 13:43 ` Ondrej Zary
2005-06-13 18:13 ` Grant Coady
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42ADBBE0.1030901@rainbow-software.org \
--to=linux@rainbow-software.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=grant_lkml@dodo.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.