From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pedro Gracia Subject: Re: Crashme test Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:33:46 +0100 Message-ID: <42AF06EA.5060601@neuroomante.com> References: <42925F9D.5030409@neuroomante.com> <20050611093438.GA5432@snarc.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20050611093438.GA5432@snarc.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi. Thanks! Good job! Test complete, total real time: 3613 seconds (0 01:00:13) exit status ... number of cases 26368 ... 1 31744 ... 1 56576 ... 1 0 ... 1 64000 ... 2 256 ... 1 3072 ... 1 29696 ... 1 49152 ... 1 56064 ... 1 8448 ... 1 8960 ... 1 65280 ... 1 9 ... 50 25600 ... 119 11 ... 3548 Cheers, Pedro Vincent Hanquez wrote: >On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:56:29PM +0100, Pedro Gracia wrote: > > >>Hi all, >> >>I'm using Xen in a desktop enviroment with debian and fdl for about six >>weeks and finally, after a lot of weeks with continuous resets (instant >>shutdowns) while I'm using firefox in my debian dom0 and the same resets >>with a conexant usb modem (while the modem is starting the beeps for the >>call), I found a test that reset my Xen box in less of 1 second... >> >>ii crashme 2.4-5 Stress tests operating system stability >> >>My box pass the crashme test with a normal 2.6.11.8 kernel for a few >>minutes (I didn't to use crashme for an hour). >> >>Someone can test this? I'm using Xen 2.0.6 (stable) but I had the same >>resets with an Xen-unstable too. >> >> > >The crashme problem should now be resolved in testing and unstable. > >It would be helpful if more people give Xen some more stress with crashme >just to be sure. > >Thanks, > >