All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Lord <lord@xfs.org>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@sgi.com>
Cc: "K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	pozsy@uhulinux.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: Race condition in module load causing undefined symbols
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:27:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42AF2FA1.7080403@xfs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42AF2088.3090605@sgi.com>

Thanks Prarit,

I updated mkinitrd from 4.1.18 to 4.2.15 and udev from 039 to 058.
This appears to have cured it on my work machine, I will try the
other box later.

Looking at Documentation/Changes, which appears to still be the
official repository for required tool versions, it seems somewhat
dated, and makes no mention of mkinitrd version requirements.

Steve

Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> Colleagues,
> 
> (Copied and edited from a post I made on linux-hotplug-devel last month.)
> 
> I've privately emailed Steve with a quick-and-dirty solution for the 
> problems he was experiencing with the system boot.  I wasn't sure if he 
> was having the same problems I've had with 2.6.12 and old packages but 
> it looks like he was.
> 
> I'm surprised we haven't had more people on this list wondering about 
> the strange behaviour of their initrd/initramfs :) .
> 
> When I looked at the original output Steve had posted I noticed that it 
> looked like drivers were attempting to load at the same time and because 
> of this he eventually hit an oops.  I (and an engineer from another 
> company working on another arch) have hit the same problem due to the 
> requirements of our current work.
> 
> (Unfortunately, I'm more familiar with RedHat/Fedora than I am with 
> other distro's -- please bear with me.)
> 
> The issue is that David Howells posted a patch that changed the 
> behaviour of kallsyms/insmod/rmmod sometime ago.  The patch *is correct* 
> in what it does, however, the patch requires that /sbin/sh must be aware 
> of pid returns by wait().
> 
>     http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/1/17/132
> 
> There are two fixes that I'm aware of, and depending on what you're 
> doing they are both "correct" (although in the case of developing in 
> 2.6.12, IMO, you
> _must_ do the latter).
> 
> The first fix is for the situation where you're developing for a 
> specific distribution.  If this is the case, then you should back out 
> the patch above and continue moving forward.
> 
> The second fix, and again you must do this if you're developing 2.6.12, 
> is to *update the mkinitrd package* which has a new version of /bin/sh.
> 
> P.
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-14 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-10 14:03 Race condition in module load causing undefined symbols Stephen Lord
2005-06-10 18:25 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-10 19:06   ` Steve Lord
2005-06-11  3:30   ` Stephen Lord
2005-06-11  8:26   ` Pozsár Balázs
2005-06-11 13:23     ` Steve Lord
2005-06-11 15:05       ` Pozsár Balázs
2005-06-11 17:56         ` Stephen Lord
2005-06-11 19:00           ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-11 19:08             ` Pozsár Balázs
2005-06-11 20:09             ` Steve Lord
2005-06-11 20:18               ` Pozsár Balázs
2005-06-14 13:34             ` Steve Lord
2005-06-14 15:33               ` K.R. Foley
2005-06-14 15:36               ` K.R. Foley
2005-06-14 16:38                 ` Steve Lord
2005-06-14 16:56                   ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-14 17:16                     ` Steve Lord
2005-06-14 20:56                     ` Pozsár Balázs
2005-06-14 17:10                   ` K.R. Foley
2005-06-14 17:39                     ` Steve Lord
2005-06-14 18:23                       ` Prarit Bhargava
2005-06-14 19:27                         ` Steve Lord [this message]
2005-06-14 19:32                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-06-14 20:59                         ` Pozsár Balázs
2005-06-15 11:28                           ` Prarit Bhargava
2005-06-15 11:34                             ` Pozsár Balázs
2005-06-15 11:35                               ` Prarit Bhargava
2005-06-15 11:43                                 ` Pozsár Balázs
2005-06-15 12:33                             ` Stephen Lord
2005-07-28 19:42                               ` David Howells
2005-06-12  6:49 ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42AF2FA1.7080403@xfs.org \
    --to=lord@xfs.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=kr@cybsft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pozsy@uhulinux.hu \
    --cc=prarit@sgi.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.