From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arun Sharma Subject: Re: bitkeeper gone in 2 weeks - which RCS? Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 12:54:43 -0700 Message-ID: <42AF3603.1060207@intel.com> References: <1118777205.2404.282.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1118777205.2404.282.camel@localhost.localdomain> <42AF3354.80603@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Ronald G. Minnich" Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ronald G. Minnich wrote: > if I did not use git, I would probably just use SVN. I've just been > through this mess with linuxbios and 'arch', and arch has just been > painful. > > there are arguably lots better systems than svn, but svn works. svn works when you're not branching and merging frequently. True, there is a lot of noise in the SCM space these days... -Arun