From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>
Subject: Re: sata_nv and RAID1
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:53:15 +0100
Message-ID: <42AF51CB.2020801@dgreaves.com>
References: <200506111613.42962.dvadell@lantech.com.ar>	 <20050611192606.GA4055@pentafluge.infradead.org>	 <42AB49BC.50104@tls.msk.ru> <42AD2B85.30303@pobox.com>	 <42AD74BD.8050704@tls.msk.ru> <62b0912f05061414116f7afedc@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <62b0912f05061414116f7afedc@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

Molle Bestefich wrote:

>Michael Tokarev wrote:
>  
>
>>Without proper error handling [...]
>>linux SATA subsystem isn't ready for production,
>>and people should not rely on it *now*.
>>    
>>
>
>As long as disks aren't removed, it's OK for production..
>
>But I'll agree with anyone who says that IDE under Linux just sucks
>donkey ass compared to IDE under Windows.  With Windows 2K and later,
>unplugging both SATA and PATA devices Just Works (tm).  I'm having a
>hard time figuring how this works: there's enough people supporting
>Linux to build a complete web-enabled SCM system (git) in a couple of
>weeks,
>
SW engineering

> but noone has bothered to fix this glaring flaw for the past 5
>years? 
>
HW engineering

> What gives?
>  
>