From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ed W <lists@wildgooses.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:55:20 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] nesting htbs
Message-Id: <42B01728.6070103@wildgooses.com>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <39458b08050609033727183846@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <39458b08050609033727183846@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org


> I wouldn't put sfq on interactive - I would add a bfifo so I could set 
> and play with the buffer lengths.


I agree.  I think SFQ might reorder packets?  It sometimes seems to 
cause some difficult to trace gremlins on my VoIP stuff, which might be 
due to packet re-ordering?

Best to stick with a bfifo I think

Ed W
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc