From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arun Sharma Subject: Re: Re: xend issues Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:26:39 -0700 Message-ID: <42B0AB1F.4040309@intel.com> References: <39CC97884CA19A4D8D6296FE94357BCB02611240@swsmsx404> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <39CC97884CA19A4D8D6296FE94357BCB02611240@swsmsx404> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Neugebauer, Rolf" Cc: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Neugebauer, Rolf wrote: > >>BTW, this issue doesn't happen if I use a different name for the new >>domain (xm create name=foo). Normally xend doesn't let me create two >>domains with the same name. But in this case, it does let me do it and >>then gets confused about domain ids and uuids. > > > I haven't had the issue with two vms with the same name and same ID, > but, my experience is that the VMX domains linger around till you > forcible (-9) kill the device model. > In the last few days, this happens even after kill -9. -Arun