From: Mike Wray <mike.wray@hp.com>
To: Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@intel.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Re: xend issues
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:08:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42B2D94C.8090000@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42B093B3.1060404@intel.com>
Arun Sharma wrote:
> Arun Sharma wrote:
>
>>
>> Lately, I'm having trouble destroying VMX domains (probably due to bad
>> reference counts) - although all memory associated with the domain is
>> freed up.
>>
>> Subsequently, if I create a new domain of the same name, the domain id
>> is wrong.
>>
>> # xm list
>> Name Id Mem(MB) CPU VCPU(s) State Time(s) Console
>> Domain-0 0 245 0 1 r---- 50.8
>> ExampleVMXDomain 1 0 0 1 ----- 22.5 9601
>> ExampleVMXDomain 1 0 0 1 ----- 22.5 9601
>>
>> Even the uuid of the two domains is the same in the long listing below.
This may be due to a xend 'feature'. When deciding whether there is a vm name clash,
xend ignores 'dead' domains, so that zombies don't stop you reusing the name.
Since the ExampleVMXDomain has mem 0 I'd guess it's been destroyed but
refused to die. The duplicate ids are a puzzle though, since the xend domain
map is indexed by domain id.
The kernel cleanup for VMX domains in xend releases the device model event channel -
but it seems from another message that the device model is not using the port
that xend has, but another one. This might account for the domain refusing to go
away - open event channels will do that.
> BTW, this issue doesn't happen if I use a different name for the new
> domain (xm create name=foo). Normally xend doesn't let me create two
> domains with the same name. But in this case, it does let me do it and
> then gets confused about domain ids and uuids.
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-17 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-15 20:43 xend issues Arun Sharma
2005-06-15 20:46 ` Arun Sharma
2005-06-17 14:08 ` Mike Wray [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-15 22:25 Neugebauer, Rolf
2005-06-15 22:26 ` Arun Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42B2D94C.8090000@hp.com \
--to=mike.wray@hp.com \
--cc=arun.sharma@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.