From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arun Sharma Subject: Re: bitkeeper gone in 2 weeks - which RCS? Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:03:20 -0700 Message-ID: <42B72F18.5080205@intel.com> References: <1119299996.5380.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1119299996.5380.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Rik van Riel Cc: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Rik van Riel wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Paul Larson wrote: > > >>I don't know if this feature is important to anyone but me, but hg >>currently doesn't allow you to pull a specific revision, making testing >>back through versions to find the point where something broke very >>difficult: > > > But can you clone a repository locally and undo the > changes you don't want ? > This was on xen-devel a while ago. The argument that Matt made was that you can never undo things in a distributed system (because someone else could've pulled from you before you did undo). hg co is not good enough for now? -Arun