From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcus Sundberg <marcus@ingate.com>
Subject: Valid netmasks for nethash type IP sets?
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:23:12 +0200
Message-ID: <42B822D0.9040401@ingate.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

Hi,

is there any particular implementation detail behind the reason why
the nethash set rejects the special case of /32 and /0 ? I would find
it quite convenient if the nethash set was able to store "networks"
consisting of a single address as well as the "everything" network.

//Marcus
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------
  Marcus Sundberg <marcus@ingate.com>  | Firewalls with SIP & NAT
 Software Developer, Ingate Systems AB |  http://www.ingate.com/