From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amin Azez Subject: Re: [RFC] alternative to conntrack ID Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:09:54 +0100 Message-ID: <42B92AE2.3070004@ufomechanic.net> References: <424747E3.7000300@eurodev.net> <4254258E.5000204@eurodev.net> <42627BC4.8070103@trash.net> <20050429080242.GJ9735@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <42789366.20702@ufomechanic.net> <4278B23A.7050406@trash.net> <4278B98E.7090707@ufomechanic.net> <427B8A46.8090006@trash.net> <427D26E7.8060701@ingate.com> <427D3EAF.3020200@trash.net> <427D41FA.5080506@ingate.com> <1115648236.25627.17.camel@nienna.balabit> <428A1807.8070708@ufomechanic.net> <428A5141.20901@trash.net> <42A23EDA.2090307@eurodev.net> <42A24F3B.8050607@eurodev.net> <42A83B96.4050302@eurodev.net> <42A83D72.1000106@eurodev.net> <42A9698F.30909@eurodev.net> , Jozsef Kadlecsik Return-path: To: Patrick McHardy In-Reply-To: <42B6EADF.9040002@trash.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Patrick McHardy wrote: >Amin Azez wrote: > > >>One of my uses for conntrack is for statistics and analysis and to >>reduce race conditions in taking actions on a particular conntrack. >> >>I need some kind of conntrack ID that will be consistent in the medium >>term accross different conntrack manipulations >> >> > >That is why I've always argued in favour of the ID. Since its needed for >other reasons too, I suggest to just keep it and get on. > > Err... the current problem is that the conntrack id _may_ be re-used within milli-seconds? I was trying to find a safe conntrack id. Amin