From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH] update raw patch in POM Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:38:07 +0200 Message-ID: <42B9B00F.90601@trash.net> References: <42A6AB19.2040106@tac.ch> <42A6E685.3060408@eurodev.net> <42AEF774.8060300@tac.ch> <42B67BEC.1090105@tac.ch> <20050621003441.GI8335@postel.suug.ch> <42B76474.8080209@eurodev.net> <20050621111328.GK8335@postel.suug.ch> <42B81D75.8090205@trash.net> <20050621215027.GP8335@postel.suug.ch> <42B8B181.4020607@trash.net> <20050622005243.GQ8335@postel.suug.ch> <42B8DA09.9080406@eurodev.net> <42B8E141.1080902@trash.net> <42B94DFE.2070205@tac.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Developers , Pablo Neira Return-path: To: Roberto Nibali In-Reply-To: <42B94DFE.2070205@tac.ch> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Roberto Nibali wrote: > Back with some results. > > Jun 22 15:12:18 s_int@sem-arbeit NET: 11980617 messages suppressed. > Jun 22 15:12:18 s_int@sem-arbeit untracked_use_cnt: 2, conntrack_cnt: 0 > Jun 22 15:12:18 s_int@sem-arbeit untracked_use_cnt: 2, conntrack_cnt: 0 > Jun 22 15:12:18 s_int@sem-arbeit untracked_use_cnt: 2, conntrack_cnt: 0 > Jun 22 15:12:18 s_int@sem-arbeit untracked_use_cnt: 2, conntrack_cnt: 0 > Jun 22 15:12:18 s_int@sem-arbeit untracked_use_cnt: 2, conntrack_cnt: 0 > Jun 22 15:12:18 s_int@sem-arbeit untracked_use_cnt: 2, conntrack_cnt: 0 > Jun 22 15:12:18 s_int@sem-arbeit untracked_use_cnt: 2, conntrack_cnt: 0 > Jun 22 15:12:18 s_int@sem-arbeit untracked_use_cnt: 2, conntrack_cnt: 0 > Jun 22 15:12:18 s_int@sem-arbeit untracked_use_cnt: 2, conntrack_cnt: 0 > Jun 22 15:12:18 s_int@sem-arbeit untracked_use_cnt: 2, conntrack_cnt: 0 > Jun 22 15:12:23 s_int@sem-arbeit NET: 26269793 messages suppressed. > Jun 22 15:12:23 s_int@sem-arbeit untracked_use_cnt: 2, conntrack_cnt: 0 > Jun 22 15:12:28 s_int@sem-arbeit NET: 26417688 messages suppressed. > Jun 22 15:12:28 s_int@sem-arbeit untracked_use_cnt: 2, conntrack_cnt: 0 > Jun 22 15:12:33 s_int@sem-arbeit NET: 26284076 messages suppressed. > Jun 22 15:12:33 s_int@sem-arbeit untracked_use_cnt: 2, conntrack_cnt: 0 > Jun 22 15:12:38 s_int@sem-arbeit NET: 26310362 messages suppressed. > Jun 22 15:12:38 s_int@sem-arbeit untracked_use_cnt: 2, conntrack_cnt: 0 > Jun 22 15:12:43 s_int@sem-arbeit NET: 26308346 messages suppressed. > Jun 22 15:12:43 s_int@sem-arbeit untracked_use_cnt: 2, conntrack_cnt: 0 > Jun 22 15:12:48 s_int@sem-arbeit NET: 26244255 messages suppressed. > Jun 22 15:12:48 s_int@sem-arbeit untracked_use_cnt: 2, conntrack_cnt: 0 > Jun 22 15:12:53 s_int@sem-arbeit ip_conntrack version 2.1 (8192 buckets, 65536 max) - 324 bytes per conntrack This actually looks good, no leak, no crash. Not sure where the 30 second delay comes from, my guess is that packets are queued while the neighbour is resolved, although its pretty long. To confirm that theory you could play with the values in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/neigh/default and see if it changes anything. You said in an earlier mail regarding the wait-for-untracked-references patch: > This results in an endless loop when calling rmmod ip_conntrack. lsmod > shows (deleted) but the process is in D state. No oops of course and > no hang. > > But I cannot remove the ip_conntrack kernel module anymore. It's > "stuck". How long did you wait that time? Regards Patrick