From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 22:04:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42BA18AF.2070406@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0506221603120.11175@ppc970.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> A few notes on these things:
>
> git-apply --index /tmp/my.patch
>
> will not only apply the patch (unified patches only!), but will do the
> index updates for you while it's at it, so if the patch contains new files
> (or it deletes files), you don't need to worry about it.
The output isn't terribly helpful:
[jgarzik@pretzel netdev-2.6]$ git apply --index \
~/tmp/linux-2.6.12-rc4-cxgb2.1.1.patch
Fragment applied at offset 11
That is worse than no message at all... fragment? offset 11? did it
work? Did it apply only a "fragment" of my patch, not the whole thing?
I'm worried! </mental monologue>
Outputting the following (stolen from 'git commit') would be far more
useful:
modified: Documentation/networking/cxgb.txt
modified: drivers/net/chelsio/Makefile
deleted: drivers/net/chelsio/ch_ethtool.h
modified: drivers/net/chelsio/common.h
modified: drivers/net/chelsio/cphy.h
modified: drivers/net/chelsio/cpl5_cmd.h
modified: drivers/net/chelsio/cxgb2.c
deleted: drivers/net/chelsio/cxgb2.h
modified: drivers/net/chelsio/elmer0.h
modified: drivers/net/chelsio/espi.c
modified: drivers/net/chelsio/espi.h
modified: drivers/net/chelsio/gmac.h
modified: drivers/net/chelsio/mv88x201x.c
deleted: drivers/net/chelsio/osdep.h
modified: drivers/net/chelsio/pm3393.c
modified: drivers/net/chelsio/regs.h
modified: drivers/net/chelsio/sge.c
modified: drivers/net/chelsio/sge.h
modified: drivers/net/chelsio/subr.c
modified: drivers/net/chelsio/suni1x10gexp_regs.h
deleted: drivers/net/chelsio/tp.c
deleted: drivers/net/chelsio/tp.h
modified: include/linux/pci_ids.h
> Also, you can do
>
> git commit <list-of-files-to-commit>
>
> as a shorthand for
>
> git-update-cache <list-of-files-to-commit>
> git commit
>
> which some people will probably find more natural.
It would be natural if it functioned like 'bk citool' ;-)
git commit --figure-out-for-me-what-files-changed
'git diff' can do this, so it's certainly feasible.
Obviously added/removed files would still require git-update-cache or
git-commit<list of files>.
> "git-whatchanged" is useful if you actually want to see what the commits
> _changed_, and then you often want to use the "-p" flag to see it as
> patches. Also, it's worth pointing out the fact that you can limit it to
> certain subdirectories (or individual files) etc, ie:
>
> git-whatchanged -p drivers/net
>
> since that is often what people want.
>
> But if you just want the log, "git log" is faster and simpler and more
> correct.
I usually want just two things:
1) browse the log
2) list changes in local tree that are not in $remote_tree, a la
bk changes -L ../linux-2.6
I agree that seeing the merge csets is useful, that is why [being
ignorant of 'git log'] I used git-changes-script.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-23 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 123+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-22 22:24 Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers Jeff Garzik
2005-06-22 22:40 ` Dave Jones
2005-06-22 22:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-22 22:52 ` Dave Jones
2005-06-23 0:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-25 3:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-25 17:29 ` Dave Jones
2005-06-22 23:09 ` Greg KH
2005-06-22 23:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 0:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 0:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 1:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 1:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 2:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 2:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 3:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 3:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 5:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 5:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 6:20 ` Greg KH
2005-06-23 6:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 7:11 ` Greg KH
2005-06-23 7:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 7:38 ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-23 8:18 ` Martin Langhoff
2005-06-23 8:30 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-06-23 14:31 ` Horst von Brand
2005-06-22 23:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 0:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 1:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 7:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 15:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 0:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 1:19 ` Christian Kujau
2005-06-23 1:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-24 0:42 ` Christian Kujau
2005-06-23 2:04 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2005-06-23 2:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 3:52 ` Adam Kropelin
2005-06-23 4:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 5:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 6:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 6:07 ` Miles Bader
2005-06-23 7:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 16:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 8:01 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-06-23 2:08 ` Kurt Wall
2005-06-23 4:23 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-06-23 12:25 ` Dave Airlie
2005-06-23 23:56 ` Mercurial vs " Matt Mackall
2005-06-24 6:41 ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-24 12:38 ` Christopher Li
2005-06-28 15:00 ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-28 15:00 ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-28 15:10 ` Andrew Thompson
2005-06-28 15:10 ` Andrew Thompson
2005-06-28 15:35 ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-28 15:35 ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-28 21:54 ` Horst von Brand
2005-06-28 18:47 ` Christopher Li
2005-06-28 18:47 ` Christopher Li
2005-06-29 0:12 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-29 0:12 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-28 18:01 ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-28 18:01 ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-28 20:27 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-28 20:27 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-28 20:45 ` Sean
2005-06-28 22:14 ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-28 22:14 ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-28 22:23 ` Sean
2005-06-28 22:23 ` Sean
2005-06-28 22:47 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-28 22:47 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-28 22:49 ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-28 22:49 ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-28 22:59 ` Sean
2005-06-28 22:59 ` Sean
2005-06-28 23:25 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-28 23:25 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-28 23:37 ` Sean
2005-06-28 23:37 ` Sean
2005-06-29 0:08 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-29 0:08 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-29 0:25 ` Sean
2005-06-29 0:25 ` Sean
2005-06-29 3:53 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-29 3:53 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-29 10:27 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-06-28 23:29 ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-28 23:29 ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-29 6:32 ` Thomas Arendsen Hein
2005-06-24 13:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-24 13:39 ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-06-24 13:46 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2005-06-24 12:19 ` Christopher Li
2005-06-24 13:57 ` Kevin Smith
2005-06-24 18:03 ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-28 15:07 ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-28 15:15 ` Sven Verdoolaege
2005-06-28 15:34 ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-28 16:50 ` Cygwin and Native MS Windows (was: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers) Kevin Smith
2005-06-28 16:51 ` Cogito vs. Git " Kevin Smith
2005-06-28 20:54 ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-24 13:16 ` Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers Matthias Urlichs
2005-06-24 13:16 ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-06-24 19:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-24 19:25 ` John W. Linville
2005-06-24 22:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-24 21:11 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-06-24 22:08 ` Should "git-read-tree -m -u" delete files? Junio C Hamano
2005-06-24 22:45 ` Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers Joel Becker
2005-06-24 23:08 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-27 18:31 ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-27 19:05 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-27 19:40 ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-27 19:51 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2005-06-27 19:51 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2005-06-27 20:51 ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-27 20:51 ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-27 21:53 ` Ed Tomlinson
2005-07-08 15:18 ` Amin Azez
2005-07-11 8:56 ` Amin Azez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42BA18AF.2070406@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.