From: Jerry Van Baren <gerald.vanbaren@smiths-aerospace.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Strange : Same 8248 image needs to be reprogrammed
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:07:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42BAC21C.6020105@smiths-aerospace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050623134611.48628.qmail@web15908.mail.cnb.yahoo.com>
Sam Song wrote:
> --- Sam Song <samsongshu@yahoo.com.cn> wrote:
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>After porting u-boot on a 8248 board, I was confused
>>
>>by a programming problem with WireTAP. For the sake
>>of 8248/8260 HRCW theory, RSTCONF must pull up to
>>connect 8248 target with a No-head config file when
>>there is a blank FLASH on board or WireTAP cannot
>>init the target correctly. The programming process
>>is
>>as follows:
>>
>>Pull up RSTCONF -> Connect WireTAP with No-head
>>config file -> Program the image on 0xff000000
>>-> Disconnect WireTAP -> Pull down RSTCONF
>>-> Power-on -> No serial output -> Power-down
>>-> Connect WireTAP with head config file
>>-> Reprogram the same image at 0xff000000
>>-> Disconnect WireTAP -> Power-on -> Work!
>>
>>We suspected sth wrong on first programmig. So we
>>checked the FLASH content with WireTAP but found
>>at least first and last three bytes had the right
>>content. Should I need to check all FLASH content?
>>The image I compiled first is about 100KByte!!!
>
>
> Ummm, a little improvement. I finally found out
> the problem was due to first program itself. The
> new flash with first config file could only be
> programmed with a limited sector.
>
> Programmed part location:
> 0x0 - 0x800; 0x10000 - 0x10800; 0x20000 - 0x20800.
>
> Seems 2KB in every 64KB area was programmed when
> RSTCONF pulls up. Still a strang phenomenon to me:-)
>
>
>>Could anyone have similar experience on 8260 series
>>target? How about BDI2000 on it? Any idea?
>
>
> If anyone share their experience on BDI would be
> a great help.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sam
The reason your first approach didn't work is because the HRCW gets read
from the _first_32_bytes_ of flash (four reads at offsets 0, 8, 16, 24
with CS0 asserted). It isn't read from any true "address" - BR0/OR0 are
configured by the HRCW and thus cannot be used for reading the HRCW.
When you programmed u-boot at 0xFFF00000, u-boot was programmed into the
proper location but the HRCW got programmed into the top part of your
flash device, _not_ the first 32 bytes. When you programmed u-boot at
0xFF000000, you got the HRCW in the right place but not u-boot (but that
was OK because you programmed it in the right place previously).
This is another reason for doing "low-boot" rather than "high-boot": in
"low-boot" mode, both u-boot and the HRCW get placed in the proper
memory locations inherently.
Answering your second question, my experience is that RSTCONF is
necessary and _barely_ sufficient to program the HRCW in the first 32
bytes of flash. I never try to do more than that. Once you have a
valid HRCW programmed, deassert RSTCONF, cycle power (IMPORTANT since
the HRCW is only read on a full reset) and proceed normally.
gvb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-23 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-13 11:42 [U-Boot-Users] Strange : Same 8248 image needs to be reprogrammed Sam Song
2005-06-23 13:46 ` Sam Song
2005-06-23 14:07 ` Jerry Van Baren [this message]
2005-06-27 7:07 ` Sam Song
2005-06-27 12:04 ` Jerry Van Baren
2005-06-28 11:53 ` Sam Song
2005-06-28 12:30 ` Jerry Van Baren
2005-06-28 12:58 ` Sam Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42BAC21C.6020105@smiths-aerospace.com \
--to=gerald.vanbaren@smiths-aerospace.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.