From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:37:03 -0700 Message-ID: <42BBAA0F.2020404@namesys.com> References: <200506221733.j5MHXEoH007541@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <42B9DD48.6060601@slaphack.com> <17081.58619.671650.812286@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <42BAC668.2030604@slaphack.com> <17083.14428.546772.353003@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <17083.14428.546772.353003@gargle.gargle.HOWL> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Nikita Danilov Cc: David Masover , "Artem B. Bityuckiy" , =?UTF-8?B?TWFya3VzIFTQlnJucXZpc3Q=?= , Christophe Saout , Andrew Morton , hch@infradead.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Nikita, I respectfully disagree with what you say about the state of our atomicity code. It is not so far away as you describe, and probably 6 man weeks work could polish it off. You don't see the value in what I define as useful, namely atomicity without isolation. Since you don't see that, it is harder for you to see that something is close to working and just needs 6 weeks of someone who groks what I am asking for. Hans