From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 12:05:27 -0700
Message-ID: <42BEFC77.6000608@namesys.com>
References: <fa.d8odcmh.1u56sbb@ifi.uio.no> <fa.cg8nk4u.jj8tqg@ifi.uio.no> <42BE5058.4070307@reub.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-24634-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <42BE5058.4070307@reub.net>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Reuben Farrelly <reuben-lkml@reub.net>, vitaly@thebsh.namesys.com
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com>, Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

Reuben Farrelly wrote:

> Hi Hans,
>
> On 25/06/2005 12:38 a.m., Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>> fsck is better in V4 than it is in V3. Users should move from V3 to V4,
>> as V3 is obsolete. I agree on that Ted.
>
>
> Perhaps before moving to V4, reiser4progs-1.04 (the most recent I
> think) could be made to compile with gcc4/fedora core 4 system, and
> some of the warnings cleaned up.  There are a fair lot of them - all
> the same warnings as below but in a heap of different files.
>
I will ask Vitaly to look into this.  None of us at Namesys use fedora.....

Vitaly?

Hans