From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roberto Nibali Subject: Re: [PATCH] update raw patch in POM Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:53:21 +0200 Message-ID: <42C004D1.2030304@tac.ch> References: <42A6AB19.2040106@tac.ch> <42A6E685.3060408@eurodev.net> <42AEF774.8060300@tac.ch> <42B67BEC.1090105@tac.ch> <20050621003441.GI8335@postel.suug.ch> <42B76474.8080209@eurodev.net> <20050621111328.GK8335@postel.suug.ch> <42B81D75.8090205@trash.net> <20050621215027.GP8335@postel.suug.ch> <42B8B181.4020607@trash.net> <20050622005243.GQ8335@postel.suug.ch> <42B8DA09.9080406@eurodev.net> <42B8E141.1080902@trash.net> <42B94DFE.2070205@tac.ch> <42B9B00F.90601@trash.net> <42BF9E5D.4000705@tac.ch> <42BFDBA1.7060002@trash.net> <42BFEC10.20102@tac.ch> <42BFF730.2080300@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Developers , Pablo Neira Return-path: To: Patrick McHardy In-Reply-To: <42BFF730.2080300@trash.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org >>>Try halving all values and see if it has any effects on the time >>>it takes to unload the module. >> >>Nope, I'll upload the new results shortly but the time is unchanged. >> > > Hmm I'm out of ideas. Well, maybe we're not in sync anymore regarding my test conducts: Given, that a1: wait-for-untracked-refs patch a2: nf_reset patch I have following test chart: | a1 enabled | a1 disabled | -----------+----------------+----------------+ a2 enabled | fix, no hang | not tested | -----------+----------------+----------------+ a2 disabled| 30s hang | crash | -----------+----------------+----------------+ > If the nf_reset patch helps it must be somewhere after > ip_finish_output2(). This could be an arp queue, a device queue > or a packet socket queue. You could add an nf_reset to dev_queue_xmit > and see if it changes anything. Maybe the above sketch explains the confusion I might have created. > There's no raw table in 2.4, so the wait-for-untracked-refs patch should > go in the 2.4 raw table patch. Pablo, shall I do it and submit for POM? > For 2.6 I'm not sure yet, Pablo has a > patch that changes how untracked works and makes this patch unnecessary. Hmm, is it possible to backport this to 2.4.x or do the changes need the 2.6.x netfilter framework? > The nf_reset patch with go in my next 2.4 update, which should happen > soon. Excellent, thank you for your patience, Roberto Nibali, ratz -- ------------------------------------------------------------- addr://Rathausgasse 31, CH-5001 Aarau tel://++41 62 823 9355 http://www.terreactive.com fax://++41 62 823 9356 ------------------------------------------------------------- terreActive AG Wir sichern Ihren Erfolg -------------------------------------------------------------