From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:40:49 -0700 Message-ID: <42C09C91.6000901@namesys.com> References: <42BB7B32.4010100@slaphack.com> <200506240334.j5O3YowB008100@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <20050627092138.GD11013@nysv.org> <20050627124255.GB6280@thunk.org> <42C0578F.7030608@namesys.com> <42C05F16.5000804@xfs.org> <20050627202841.GA27805@thunk.org> <42C06873.7020102@xfs.org> <42C0868E.4080003@punnoor.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <42C0868E.4080003@punnoor.de> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Prakash Punnoor Cc: Steve Lord , Theodore Ts'o , Markus T?rnqvist , Horst von Brand , David Masover , Alan Cox , Jeff Garzik , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ReiserFS List Prakash Punnoor wrote: > >. But nevertheless it didn't survive, as like V3, with time V4 became >slower and slower. In this case no year was needed, but just one month or >alike. So end of test...but in fact I'll give V4 another go in the near future. > > Interesting that it got slower with time. It sounds like our online repacker is much needed. It will be a priority for after the kernel merge.