From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" <dedekind@yandex.ru>
Subject: Re: Reiser4 + seekdir()
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:29:19 +0400
Message-ID: <42C277FF.5070206@yandex.ru>
References: <42BFC6B0.7040202@yandex.ru>	 <1119872500.4257.260.camel@tribesman.namesys.com>	 <42BFEC62.1010907@yandex.ru>	 <1119875956.4256.277.camel@tribesman.namesys.com>	 <42BFF7D3.3010206@yandex.ru>	 <1119880168.4257.326.camel@tribesman.namesys.com>	 <42C004E0.5060405@yandex.ru> <42C0588C.7030905@namesys.com>	 <42C244D8.1070408@yandex.ru> <1120040525.3860.40.camel@tribesman.namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-24792-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <1120040525.3860.40.camel@tribesman.namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Vladimir Saveliev <vs@namesys.com>
Cc: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
> Existence of various plugins assumes that user is able to choose
> whatever is suitable for him. Or create his own plugin if none of
> existing ones satisfies him.
> If user cares a lot about using telldir/seekdir he is supposed to choose
> SEEKABLE_HASHED_DIR_PLUGIN_ID.
Hmm...

May be I don't understand the difference, but the two plugins are *both* 
seekable. Furthermore, AFAICS, it is implemented the same way in both 
cases. So, why user may prefer SEEKABLE_HASHED_DIR_PLUGIN_ID?

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem B. Bityuckiy,
St.-Petersburg, Russia.