All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tyler <pml@dtbb.net>
To: John Rowe <rowe@excc.ex.ac.uk>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Slow reconstruction
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:54:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42C2E059.2090502@dtbb.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1120066268.21458.252.camel@volt>

For 250GB drives, those Buffered disk reads seem rather slow.. they 
should be in the 35-50 range.  I would check your dma settings with 
hdparm as someone already suggested.  What speed of processor is in the 
server, and what type of IDE cards/controllers?  Maybe also check your 
/proc/interrupts for errors.. maybe you have an IRQ conflict.  Also 
double check your dmesg output.  What kernel are you using?

Tyler.

John Rowe wrote:

>Thanks for all the suggestions. 
>
>/proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max had the value "10000", changing it to
>200000 didn't make a difference. hdparm looks OK to me:
>
>/dev/hdm1:
> Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  1.19 seconds =107.56 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  3.13 seconds = 20.45 MB/sec
>
>/dev/hdo1:
> Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  1.17 seconds =109.40 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  3.85 seconds = 16.62 MB/sec
>rsync:/root# hdparm -Tt /dev/hda4
>
>/dev/hda4:
> Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  1.15 seconds =111.30 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  4.31 seconds = 14.85 MB/sec
>
>/dev/hdc4:
> Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  1.16 seconds =110.34 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  4.79 seconds = 13.36 MB/sec
>
>/dev/hdi3:
> Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  1.16 seconds =110.34 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  2.73 seconds = 23.44 MB/sec
>
>/dev/hdk1:
> Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  1.16 seconds =110.34 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  2.72 seconds = 23.53 MB/sec
>
>
>DMA is enabled for all six disks.
>
>If it helps, here is my raidtab. I wonder a little about the 64K chunk
>size on the stripe but a 128K size on the RAID5. Is this good or bad?
>
>raiddev             /dev/md0
>raid-level                  1
>nr-raid-disks               2
>chunk-size                  64k
>persistent-superblock       1
>nr-spare-disks              0
>    device          /dev/hda2
>    raid-disk     0
>    device          /dev/hdc2
>    raid-disk     1
>
>
>raiddev             /dev/md2
>raid-level                  0
>nr-raid-disks               2
>chunk-size                  64k
>persistent-superblock       1
>nr-spare-disks              0
>    device          /dev/hdm1
>    raid-disk     0
>    device          /dev/hdo1
>    raid-disk     1
>
>raiddev             /dev/md3
>raid-level                  5
>nr-raid-disks               5
>chunk-size                  128k
>parity-algorithm        left-symmetric
>persistent-superblock       1
>nr-spare-disks              0
>    device          /dev/hda4
>    raid-disk     0
>    device          /dev/hdc4
>    raid-disk     1
>    device          /dev/hdi3
>    raid-disk     2
>    device          /dev/hdk1
>    raid-disk     3
>    device          /dev/md2
>    raid-disk     4
>
>
>Comments gratefully received.
>
>John
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>  
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-06-29 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-29 16:10 Slow reconstruction John Rowe
2005-06-29 16:40 ` Mike Hardy
2005-06-29 17:31   ` John Rowe
2005-06-29 17:46     ` seth vidal
2005-06-29 17:49       ` John Rowe
2005-06-29 17:49     ` KELEMEN Peter
2005-06-29 17:52       ` John Rowe
2005-06-29 18:00         ` KELEMEN Peter
2005-06-29 17:54     ` Tyler [this message]
2005-06-29 17:32 ` seth vidal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42C2E059.2090502@dtbb.net \
    --to=pml@dtbb.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rowe@excc.ex.ac.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.