From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: Remaining arch problems in cpu_idle
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 09:38:52 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42C3310C.8070004@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B8E391BBE9FE384DAA4C5C003888BE6F03D0B5D6@scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com>
Luck, Tony wrote:
>>h8300, ia64, and sh64 still have possible outstanding issues,
>>which I've put at the end of the Documentation/ file. It
>>would be nice to get these looked at.
>
>
> +ia64 - is safe_halt call racy vs interrupts? (does it sleep?) (See #4a)
>
> safe_halt() makes a call to PAL[1] to go to a lower power state. It does
> not do anything that would require a sleep.
>
So it won't need an interrupt to be revived out of that state?
Thank you Tony, I'll take ia64 off the list.
The other change I made to ia64 is to use TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG to
inhibit wakeup IPIs to idle threads - is this something that
looks acceptable?
Clearing TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG from around safe_halt() in my patch
is superfluous if safe_halt doesn't require an interrupt to wake
up - I'll remove that hunk.
Thanks,
Nick
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-29 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-29 21:51 Remaining arch problems in cpu_idle Luck, Tony
2005-06-29 23:38 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-30 0:07 Luck, Tony
2005-06-30 0:17 ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-29 23:46 Luck, Tony
2005-06-29 23:55 ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-29 7:06 Nick Piggin
2005-06-29 8:00 ` Paul Mundt
2005-06-29 9:09 ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-29 10:11 ` Paul Mundt
2005-06-29 10:20 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42C3310C.8070004@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.