From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1DnwVy-0008Ii-FH for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 06:43:26 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DnwVk-0008BN-SH for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 06:43:13 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DnwUq-0007iE-3C for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 06:42:18 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DnwNk-0006JK-7X for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 06:34:56 -0400 Received: from [217.12.11.36] (helo=smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DnwL3-0001Nd-07 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 06:32:09 -0400 Received: (qmail 83530 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2005 10:27:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) (subdino2004@83.194.188.212 with plain) by smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Jun 2005 10:27:06 -0000 Message-ID: <42C3C8FC.6050600@yahoo.fr> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:27:08 +0200 From: Vincent Pelletier User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <20050629083358.250134cc@localhost> <42C2BC69.8080102@yahoo.fr> <42C2C55F.9010203@yahoo.fr> <87irzwf9ix.fsf@student.han.nl> In-Reply-To: <87irzwf9ix.fsf@student.han.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [PATCH] grub2: commands/cmp.c: grub_cmd_cmp() X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:43:23 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Marco Gerards wrote: > I think BUFFER_SIZE would be a better name. Another size can be > used. Perhaps it is better to use a bigger buffer size? As we read from a block device, I think the best size would be a multiple of the block size... But yes, it could be named buffer size. And it could even be dynamicaly allocated, to prevent using too much space on stack. > Huh? Some remains from a change-and-undo... I'll send a new patch with a correct changelog :). Vincent Pelletier -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCw8j8FEQoKRQyjtURApAVAKCUiOSXjhRmv5Sy/Hkct/9rqZjapwCeNZws iYms73xiAlh3TMEgfIoctA4= =+ko/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ___________________________________________________________________________ Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com