From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Masover Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 03:16:57 -0500 Message-ID: <42C4FBF9.8080601@slaphack.com> References: <200506291719.j5THJCSg011438@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <200506291719.j5THJCSg011438@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: Horst von Brand Cc: Markus T rnqvist , Douglas McNaught , Hubert Chan , Kyle Moffett , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Lincoln Dale , Gregory Maxwell , Hans Reiser , Jeff Garzik , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ReiserFS List Horst von Brand wrote: > Markus T=C3=B6rnqvist wrote: >=20 > [...] >=20 >=20 >>Note that MacOS has the monopoly on what they ship, Linux has a >>motherload of file managers and window systems and all. >=20 >=20 > Yep. Part of what is nice about it, too ;-) >=20 >=20 >>What pisses me off is the fact that Gnome and friends implement >>their own incompatible-with-others VFS's and automounters and >>stuff. >=20 >=20 > Then get them to agree on a common framework! They are trying hard to get > other parts of the GUI work well together, so this isn't far off in > wishfull thinking land. Unfortunately, this leaves bash out in the cold, as usual. Kernel-based=20 automounter works with Bash. Why can't GNOME/KDE use the kernel's one=20 as at least one backend, even if they support others?