From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 01:44:28 -0700 Message-ID: <42C5026C.20807@namesys.com> References: <200506290509.j5T595I6010576@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <87hdfgvqvl.fsf@evinrude.uhoreg.ca> <8783be6605062914341bcff7cb@mail.gmail.com> <878y0svj1h.fsf@evinrude.uhoreg.ca> <42C4F97B.1080803@slaphack.com> <42C4FC0E.7010104@namesys.com> <42C4FE70.4020809@slaphack.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <42C4FE70.4020809@slaphack.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: David Masover Cc: Hubert Chan , Ross Biro , Horst von Brand , Kyle Moffett , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Lincoln Dale , Gregory Maxwell , Jeff Garzik , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ReiserFS List David Masover wrote: > Hans Reiser wrote: > >> It was always the expectation that users would want to have one >> mountpoint with the files having metafiles as files, and another with >> the same files but strictly posix, and then their apps can use whichever >> they have the power to understand. > > > It was never in the early betas I tried :( Yes, well, there are a lot of things missing in functionality still from what was, and still is, in the plan. Inheritance, files not listed by readdir, etc., lots of things need coding. We have done the hard stuff first though, so these other things will mostly not be a lot of code.... Hans