From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261607AbVGATy3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2005 15:54:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261182AbVGATy2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2005 15:54:28 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:33781 "EHLO av.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262377AbVGATxQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2005 15:53:16 -0400 Message-ID: <42C59EDD.2080206@mvista.com> Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 12:51:57 -0700 From: George Anzinger Reply-To: george@mvista.com Organization: MontaVista Software User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050323 Fedora/1.7.6-1.3.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lkml Subject: Question about patch order Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Suppose I am doing this prior to my morning coffee, but... What should the -rc patch(s) be applied to? Should it be 2.6.x or 2.6.x.n e.g. the 2.6.12 kernel or the 2.6.12.2 kernel? If the former, does the -rc contain the .n stuff? -- George Anzinger george@mvista.com HRT (High-res-timers): http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/