From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: matthieu castet Subject: Re: [Alsa-user] sound blaster name Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 22:01:12 +0200 Message-ID: <42C84408.6080906@free.fr> References: <42B3E474.7000301@free.fr> <42B3ECD5.6030500@superbug.co.uk> <42B3F28B.4030307@free.fr> <42B3F484.5060004@free.fr> <42B3F83C.90305@superbug.co.uk> <42B5A056.4010608@free.fr> <42BC6451.8020303@free.fr> <1119647048.3290.57.camel@mindpipe> <42C71EB1.1020207@free.fr> <42C722AD.1010603@superbug.co.uk> <42C7278C.5090100@free.fr> <42C7C7EF.9030201@free.fr> <42C7D322.1050100@superbug.co.uk> <42C7E5C4.3030602@free.fr> <1120414451.7915.2.camel@mindpipe> <42C83388.4090804@free.fr> <42C842D3.90603@superbug.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <42C842D3.90603@superbug.co.uk> Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: James Courtier-Dutton Cc: Lee Revell , alsa-devel List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > matthieu castet wrote: > >>Lee Revell wrote: >> >> >>>On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 15:19 +0200, matthieu castet wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I there an easy way to know if the .sblive51 flag is needed ? >>>>Does it is needed only for 3G SB card (SBxxx version or those marked >>>>as 5.1) ? >>> >>> >>> >>>I think it's need for any SBLive! (not Audigy) that has an analog >>>center/LFE output. >>> >>>Maybe you could extract this information from the kX driver. >>> >> >>on opencreative driver they use : >> >>* 5.1: Enable the additional AC97 Slots and unmute extra channels on >>AC97 codec */ >> if (codec->codec_read(codec, AC97_EXTENDED_ID) & 0x0080){ >> printk(KERN_INFO "emu10k1: SBLive! 5.1 card >>detected\n"); >> sblive_writeptr(card, AC97SLOT, 0, AC97SLOT_CNTR >>| AC97SLOT_LFE); >> codec->codec_write(codec, AC97_SURROUND_MASTER, >>0x0); >> } >> >>It correspond to AC97_EA_SDAC. >>I don't know if it is a safe way... >> >> >>Matthieu >> > > > It is not a safe way of detecting it. > The approach I am going to take is mark each entry in the source code as > tested and the email address of someone with the card. > Then, over time we will have eventually tested all of them and also have > a contact email address if it needs retesting. ok, for CT4670 you could remove the flag and add my email adress. Matthieu ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click