From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood@blueyonder.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xm info
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 23:16:48 +0100
Message-ID: <42C863D0.1080803@blueyonder.co.uk>
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D2824BF@liverpoolst.ad.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Reply-To: david.nospam.hopwood@blueyonder.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D2824BF@liverpoolst.ad.cl.cam.ac.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Ian Pratt wrote:
> While we're at it, I'd suggest we add an extra level of hierarchy ,
> 'nodes', for NUMA, even if we have nodes hardwired to 1 at present e.g.:
> 
>>logical_cpus           : 1
>>nodes                  : 1
>>sockets_per_node       : 1
>>cores_per_socket       : 1
>>hyperthreads_per_core  : 1

Is sockets_per_node always the same for each node (similarly for
cores_per_socket and hyperthreads_per_core)?

-- 
David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood@blueyonder.co.uk>