From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 23:41:32 -0700 Message-ID: <42CCCE9C.1000704@namesys.com> References: <200507061730.j66HUZ8R015013@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <200507061730.j66HUZ8R015013@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Horst von Brand Cc: Martin Waitz , Jonathan Briggs , Ross Biro , Hubert Chan , Kyle Moffett , David Masover , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Lincoln Dale , Gregory Maxwell , Jeff Garzik , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ReiserFS List Horst von Brand wrote: >Hans Reiser wrote: > >[...] > > > >>I think the exokernel approach by Frans is a very interesting approach. >>I wish I had the experience with it necessary to know if it was >>effective. I do NOT take the position that name resolution should be in >>the kernel. I DO take the position that it should be either in the >>kernel or out of the kernel, and should constitute one cohesive and >>coherent body of code. >> >> > >Right. > > > >> If someone talks Linus into trying the exokernel >>approach, >> >> > >Are you nuts?! Such radical experiments do /not/ belong in the kernel on >which millions of machines depend! > > Your response is a flame, and I will not respond to it.