All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Belmonte <john@neggie.net>
To: "Devriendt, Paul" <paul.devriendt@amd.com>
Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: powernow-k8 and stuck change-pending bit
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 10:29:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42CFDF41.3040504@neggie.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84EA05E2CA77634C82730353CBE3A843028F4CC5@SAUSEXMB1.amd.com>

Devriendt, Paul wrote:
>>symptoms:
>>
>>    After working fine for a while (several minutes to several hours),
>>cpufreq seems to get into a bad state where:
>>
>>     * change pending bit set / stuck kernel messages appear
>>
>>     * reloading powernow-k8 module fails, with "change 
>>pending bit stuck"
> 
[...]
> The most likely scenario here is the VRM was unable to change
> voltage, and that means flaky hardware as it has previously been
> able to successfully do so. The reason I pick on the VRM and not
> some sort of issue with the HyperTransport fabric is that it is
> unlikely anything would still be alive if there was some sort of 
> problem coming back from the LDT_STOP.
> 
> Assuming the VRM continues to supply the current voltage within 
> spec, the system will stay up indefinitely, at the current
> voltage and frequency.
> 
> The best path to follow would be to investigate warrantee replacement
> of the board.

Thanks for the info Paul.  I've had the motherboard replaced with an
identical model.  This new board seems to have the same problem, except
that when a transition finally fails, Linux hangs bad enough to require
a hard reset of the system.

With two boards having this problem, it suggests either a bad
motherboard design or some bad interaction between Linux and the
motherboard.  (It seems strange that the manufacturer wouldn't have seen
this problem under Windows.)  Much less likely is that I have a bad CPU.

--John

  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-09 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-07  5:07 powernow-k8 and stuck change-pending bit Devriendt, Paul
2005-07-09 14:29 ` John Belmonte [this message]
2005-07-26  4:34   ` John Belmonte
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-04 20:32 John Belmonte

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42CFDF41.3040504@neggie.net \
    --to=john@neggie.net \
    --cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=paul.devriendt@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.