Re: Re: Unable to add rule on Chain with 28 characters.

[Rafael Dreher <dreher@interage.com.br>]

No, that's not the case. I'm still thinking that's a bug.

[root@ward] [10:18:30]
[~]#iptables -t nat -N 123456789012345678901234567890

[root@ward] [10:18:38]
[~]#iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j 1234567890123456789012345678
iptables v1.3.2: Couldn't load target
`1234567890123456789012345678':/usr/local/lib/iptables/libipt_1234567890123456789012345678.so: cannot open shared object
file: No such file or directory

Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information.

[root@ward] [10:18:41]
[~]#

Any idea?

Thank 's

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>So, that's a BUG.
>>Why iptbles let me add a chain with 30 characters, if I can't use this chain?
>>
>>[root@ward] [10:07:54]
>>[~]#iptables -t nat -N 123456789012345678901234567890
>>
>>[root@ward] [10:08:05]
>>[~]#iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j 123456789012345678901234567890
>>iptables: No chain/target/match by that name
> 
> 
> Try
>   iptables -t nat                -N 123456789012345678901234567890
>   iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j 1234567890123456789012345678
> 
> (Maybe add a '9' to the last.) If that's the case, then this is not really a 
> bug, but some code silently truncates the -N request.
> 
> 
> 
> Jan Engelhardt

-- 
Rafael Dreher

-:: Red Hat Certified Engineer ::-
-:: Nr: 807303498507617 ::-
http://www.redhat.com/training/certification/verify