From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ed W Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:05:49 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Re: RFC - bandwidth optimization idea Message-Id: <42D4D96D.5040001@wildgooses.com> List-Id: References: <17103.60531.516880.785001@isis.cs3-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <17103.60531.516880.785001@isis.cs3-inc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org >I'm not sure I follow the problem, but if you're saying that one >stream should have priority over the other, it seems you could do >that with two different queues, one with priority over the other. >Or something like sfq could at least prevent one connection from >waiting for the other to send a lot of data. > > You could if you have control over the queues. But they are on the remote ISP end... So the problem is similar to the one you describe - once the data is inflight you lose control but you want to limit how much data is inflight so that you have as much control as possible... Ed W _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc