From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Per Crusefalk Subject: Re: SSH and the NONE option Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 11:47:34 +0200 Message-ID: <42D634B6.7050807@home.se> References: <20050714075909.GB2932@linux-mips.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20050714075909.GB2932@linux-mips.org> Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: Ralf Baechle DL5RB Cc: Bill Vodall , linux-hams@vger.kernel.org Ralf Baechle DL5RB wrote: >On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:22:22AM -0500, Bill Vodall wrote: > > =20 > >>It would be very good for us amateurs (at least we Americans living >>with regulations from the dark ages) if the "none" option on encrypti= on >>was still available. One of these days I plan to contact the openSS= H >>folks with this request -- unless somebody here has a better >>idea. >> =20 >> > >It's not only the US that forbid encryption in amateur radio - it's th= e >legislation of every country that I know of, based on international >regulations. And I'm favor of that because otherwise amateur radio >would probably turn into a fancy telephone & internet replacement. > > =20 > That used to be the case also here in Sweden but I can't find it any longer in the newer regulations. The transmission should be identified by using the callsign but that's really it. 73 de P=E4r/sm0rwo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html