From: Stephan Diestelhorst <sd386@cl.cam.ac.uk>
To: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@hp.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: More on sedf scheduler
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 19:52:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42D6B462.2020808@cl.cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42D6ABE6.1030502@hp.com>
Just another question: What kind of hardware are you running on?
Might this be related in any way to the strange IA64 bugs?
> Stephan Diestelhorst wrote:
>
>> Thanks,
>> what is your dom0 tight loop doing? Heavy I/O?
>> It looks like dom0 does a lot of I/O, which immediatelly unblocks and
>> then gets a higher priority in the L1 extraq, without anybounds on
>> executiontime, i.e. slice length. Can you confirm this?
>>
>> Stephan
>>
>>
>
> The loop was just while(1); There was also a python script running
> that was reading from xentrace. So no heavy i/o, at least no
> disk/network i/o. But that doesn't matter anyway. Here is another dump
> where dom0 is doing absolutely nothing besides while (1); And dom1 is
> completely comatose during this time.
>
> Rob
>
>
> (XEN) Scheduler: Simple EDF Scheduler (sedf)
> (XEN) NOW=0x0000004AC8DEB496
> (XEN) CPU[00] now=321199566451
> (XEN) RUNQ rq ff18cf80 n: ff18cf80, p: ff18cf80
> (XEN)
> (XEN) WAITQ rq ff18cf88 n: ffbf7e04, p: ff1bfe04
> (XEN) 0: 0.0 has=T p=20000000 sl=15000000 ddl=321220001780 w=0
> c=34111278898 sc=451020117 xtr(yes)=11730339611 ew=0 (34%)
> (XEN) 1: 1.0 has=F p=100000000 sl=0 ddl=321370002222 w=0
> c=20938650825 sc=131072 xtr(yes)=20938650825 ew=1 (100%)
> (XEN)
> (XEN) EXTRAQ (penalty) rq ff18cf90 n: ffbf7e0c, p: ffbf7e0c
> (XEN) 0: 0.0 has=T p=20000000 sl=15000000 ddl=321220001780 w=0
> c=34111278898 sc=451020117 xtr(yes)=11730339611 ew=0 (34%)
> (XEN)
> (XEN) EXTRAQ (utilization) rq ff18cf98 n: ff1bfe14, p: ffbf7e14
> (XEN) 0: 1.0 has=F p=100000000 sl=0 ddl=321370002222 w=0
> c=20938650825 sc=131072 xtr(yes)=20938650825 ew=1 (100%)
> (XEN) 1: 0.0 has=T p=20000000 sl=15000000 ddl=321220001780 w=0
> c=34111278898 sc=451020117 xtr(yes)=11730339611 ew=0 (34%)
> (XEN)
> (XEN) not on Q
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-14 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-12 18:09 Dom0 crashing on x86_64 David F Barrera
2005-07-12 22:44 ` Vincent Hanquez
2005-07-13 14:07 ` David F Barrera
2005-07-14 15:59 ` More on sedf scheduler Rob Gardner
2005-07-14 16:24 ` Stephan Diestelhorst
2005-07-14 16:25 ` Stephan Diestelhorst
2005-07-14 16:45 ` Rob Gardner
2005-07-14 17:39 ` Stephan Diestelhorst
2005-07-14 18:16 ` Rob Gardner
2005-07-14 18:52 ` Stephan Diestelhorst [this message]
2005-07-14 19:31 ` Rob Gardner
2005-07-15 23:57 ` Stephan Diestelhorst
2005-07-18 18:27 ` xuehai zhang
2005-07-22 12:22 ` Stephan Diestelhorst
2005-07-14 19:09 ` Stephan Diestelhorst
2005-07-22 17:20 ` greedy dom0 in sedf fixed! (Re: More on sedf scheduler) Stephan Diestelhorst
2005-07-22 17:45 ` Rob Gardner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42D6B462.2020808@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--to=sd386@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=rob.gardner@hp.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.