From: Hugh Caley <hcaley@plasmabat.com>
To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Performance Difference Between Linux NFS Server and Netapp
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:41:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42D6CDDE.90703@plasmabat.com> (raw)
Thank you! Just the sort of thing I'm looking for ...
Hugh
>From: Chris Penney <cpenney@gmail.com>
>Reply-To: penney@msu.edu
>To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [NFS] Performance Difference Between Linux NFS Server and Netapp
>
>
>On 7/14/05, Hugh Caley <hcaley@plasmabat.com> wrote:=20
>
>
>>>=20
>>> A valid point, of course, but I don't think I'm actually expecting a
>>> single NFSd to act like an expensive Netapp. I do think that wondering
>>> why the Netapp is twice as fast for a sequential write is a valid
>>> question, even if the OS and NFS server subsystem are free. I was kind
>>> of hoping someone would just say "you're getting what you should expect
>>> to get" or "wow, that's slow, try this and this and this".
>>
>>
>
> You referenced that you were getting 300 megabits (or 37MB/s). I have=20
>several SLES 9 nfs servers (using self compiled 2.6.11.5
><http://2.6.11.5>kernel) running on IBM x345 hardware (dual cpu pentum
>4, 2gb ram, dual
>qlogic hbas) connected to a single LSI storage array that presents four lun=
>s=20 ...
>
--
Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you. - Leviticus 11:9-12
http://godhatesshrimp.com
Hugh Caley hcaley@plasmabat.com
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next reply other threads:[~2005-07-14 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-14 20:41 Hugh Caley [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-11 22:55 Performance Difference Between Linux NFS Server and Netapp Hugh Caley
2005-07-12 16:24 ` Roger Heflin
2005-07-12 16:34 ` Joshua Baker-LePain
2005-07-12 18:19 ` Hugh Caley
2005-07-14 11:25 ` Sten Spans
2005-07-14 18:21 ` Hugh Caley
2005-07-14 19:50 ` Chris Penney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42D6CDDE.90703@plasmabat.com \
--to=hcaley@plasmabat.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.