All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tyler <pml@dtbb.net>
To: "David M. Strang" <dstrang@shellpower.net>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid5 Failure
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 19:10:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42DB0F9D.6040904@dtbb.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <004b01c58b3a$8e26f910$c200a8c0@NCNF5131FTH>

If you cat /proc/mdstat, it should show the array resyncing... when its 
done, it will put the drive back as device 26.

Tyler.

David M. Strang wrote:

> Neil --
>
> That worked, the device has been added to the array. Now, I think the 
> next problem is my own ignorance.
>
> -(root@abyss)-(/)- # mdadm --detail /dev/md0
> /dev/md0:
>        Version : 01.00.01
>  Creation Time : Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969
>     Raid Level : raid5
>     Array Size : 1935556992 (1845.89 GiB 1982.01 GB)
>    Device Size : 71687296 (68.37 GiB 73.41 GB)
>   Raid Devices : 28
>  Total Devices : 28
> Preferred Minor : 0
>    Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>
>    Update Time : Sun Jul 17 17:32:12 2005
>          State : clean, degraded
> Active Devices : 27
> Working Devices : 28
> Failed Devices : 0
>  Spare Devices : 1
>
>         Layout : left-asymmetric
>     Chunk Size : 128K
>
>           UUID : 4e2b6b0a8e:92e91c0c:018a4bf0:9bb74d
>         Events : 176939
>
>    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
>       0       8        0        0      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sda
>       1       8       16        1      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdb
>       2       8       32        2      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdc
>       3       8       48        3      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdd
>       4       8       64        4      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sde
>       5       8       80        5      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdf
>       6       8       96        6      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdg
>       7       8      112        7      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdh
>       8       8      128        8      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdi
>       9       8      144        9      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdj
>      10       8      160       10      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdk
>      11       8      176       11      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdl
>      12       8      192       12      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdm
>      13       8      208       13      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdn
>      14       8      224       14      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdo
>      15       8      240       15      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdp
>      16      65        0       16      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdq
>      17      65       16       17      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdr
>      18      65       32       18      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sds
>      19      65       48       19      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdt
>      20      65       64       20      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdu
>      21      65       80       21      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdv
>      22      65       96       22      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdw
>      23      65      112       23      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdx
>      24      65      128       24      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdy
>      25      65      144       25      active sync   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdz
>      26       0        0        -      removed
>      27      65      176       27      active sync   
> /dev/evms/.nodes/sdab
>
>      28      65      160        -      spare   /dev/evms/.nodes/sdaa
>
>
> I've got 28 devices, 1 spare, 27 active. I'm still running as clean, 
> degraded.
>
> What do I do next? What I wanted to do was to put /dev/sdaa back in as 
> device 26, but now it's device 28 - and flagged as spare. How do I 
> make it active in the array again?
>
> -- David M. Strang
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: Neil Brown
> To: David M. Strang
> Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 9:33 PM
> Subject: Re: Raid5 Failure
>
> Ahhhh...  I cannot read my own code, that is the problem!!
>
> This patch should fix it.
>
> Thanks for persisting.
>
> NeilBrown
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
>
> ### Diffstat output
> ./Manage.c |    7 ++-----
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff ./Manage.c~current~ ./Manage.c
> --- ./Manage.c~current~ 2005-07-07 09:19:53.000000000 +1000
> +++ ./Manage.c 2005-07-18 11:31:57.000000000 +1000
> @@ -204,11 +204,8 @@ int Manage_subdevs(char *devname, int fd
>  return 1;
>  }
>  close(tfd);
> -#if 0
> - if (array.major_version == 0) {
> -#else
> - if (md_get_version(fd)%100 < 2) {
> -#endif
> + if (array.major_version == 0 &&
> +     md_get_version(fd)%100 < 2) {
>  if (ioctl(fd, HOT_ADD_DISK,
>    (unsigned long)stb.st_rdev)==0) {
>  fprintf(stderr, Name ": hot added %s\n",
> -
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-18  2:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-17 15:44 Raid5 Failure David M. Strang
2005-07-17 22:05 ` Neil Brown
2005-07-17 23:15   ` David M. Strang
2005-07-18  0:05     ` Tyler
2005-07-18  0:23       ` David M. Strang
2005-07-18  0:06     ` Neil Brown
2005-07-18  0:52       ` David M. Strang
2005-07-18  1:06         ` Neil Brown
2005-07-18  1:26           ` David M. Strang
2005-07-18  1:31             ` David M. Strang
     [not found]           ` <001601c58b37$620c69d0$c200a8c0@NCNF5131FTH>
2005-07-18  1:33             ` Neil Brown
2005-07-18  1:46               ` David M. Strang
2005-07-18  2:10                 ` Tyler [this message]
2005-07-18  2:12                   ` David M. Strang
2005-07-18  2:15                 ` Neil Brown
2005-07-18  2:24                   ` David M. Strang
2005-07-18  2:09               ` bug report: mdadm-devel-2 , superblock version 1 Tyler
2005-07-18  2:19                 ` Tyler
2005-07-25  0:37                   ` Neil Brown
2005-07-25  0:36                 ` Neil Brown
2005-07-25  3:47                   ` Tyler
2005-07-27  2:08                     ` Neil Brown
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-15  0:39 Raid5 Failure David M. Strang
2005-07-15  1:43 ` Neil Brown
2005-07-15  2:16   ` David M. Strang
2005-07-15 20:25     ` David M. Strang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42DB0F9D.6040904@dtbb.net \
    --to=pml@dtbb.net \
    --cc=dstrang@shellpower.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.