From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Cromie Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:10:12 +0000 Subject: Re: [KJ] RFC - trailing whitespace cleanup script Message-Id: <42DBF084.3050106@divsol.com> List-Id: References: <42D9C495.2090405@divsol.com> In-Reply-To: <42D9C495.2090405@divsol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Domen Puncer wrote: >On 16/07/05 20:38 -0600, Jim Cromie wrote: > > >>Domen, all, >> >> > >Hi. > > > >>Ive considered running following 1-lineer and submitting per-subsystem >>cleanup patches. >> >> >> >No, no, no, and again no. And I do hate trailing whitespace, I have >it coloured red in vim, so there's really no other way than hating. > >So... why not? >- Maintainers will want to kill us, because no patch will apply > anymore. >- It would generate _lots_ of traffic. >- It would make it harder to trace bugs ("try to unapply that patch") >- I could probably think of some more, but first one makes it > obsolete anyways. ;-) > > >When could whitespace fixes be good? >Maybe on a driver that is in bug-fix-only state and is expected to >stay in kernel for a while (IOW, is not broken :-) ). > > OK, nevermind. and pls disregard msg I just sent, b4 seeing this one. _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors