From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261364AbVGYQgg (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:36:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261384AbVGYQgg (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:36:36 -0400 Received: from quark.didntduck.org ([69.55.226.66]:35503 "EHLO quark.didntduck.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261364AbVGYQge (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:36:34 -0400 Message-ID: <42E51593.7070902@didntduck.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:38:43 -0400 From: Brian Gerst User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-0.1.fc5 (X11/20050719) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gene Heskett CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Question re the dot releases such as 2.6.12.3 References: <200507251020.08894.gene.heskett@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <200507251020.08894.gene.heskett@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Gene Heskett wrote: > Greetings; > > I just built what I thought was 2.6.12.3, but my script got a tummy > ache because I didn't check the Makefile's EXTRA_VERSION, which was > set to .2 in the .2 patch. Now my 2.6.12 modules will need a refresh > build. :( > > So whats the proper patching sequence to build a 2.6.12.3? > The dot-release patches are not incremental. You apply each one to the base 2.6.12 tree. -- Brian Gerst