From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randolph Chung Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] [Testers wanted] New glibc with profiling fixed. Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:25:44 +0800 Message-ID: <42E647E8.3000505@tausq.org> References: <1122036994.10454.131.camel@thor.tres.org> <20050725000919.GA18659@colo.lackof.org> <1122272788.10644.71.camel@thor.tres.org> <20050726132402.GA32722@colo.lackof.org> <1122385036.10644.146.camel@thor.tres.org> <20050726141837.GB6663@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: Tres Melton , parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org To: Matthew Wilcox Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <20050726141837.GB6663@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: parisc-linux-bounces@lists.parisc-linux.org > User space should not "know" what HZ the kernel is using. Instead, all > interfaces should be properly reported in terms of whatever HZ userspace > used to assume (100 on i386, other values on other platforms). I don't > know what interface gprof is using, but it needs to be fixed. I thought gprof uses a SIGPROF timer using the setitimer interface. Why is it HZ dependent? randolph _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux