From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261826AbVGZP2K (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:28:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261841AbVGZP2K (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:28:10 -0400 Received: from vmlinux.org ([193.41.214.66]:37301 "EHLO vmlinux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261826AbVGZP2I (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:28:08 -0400 Message-ID: <42E6567C.8090402@vmlinux.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:27:56 +0200 From: Joachim Nilsson Organization: vmlinux:~/ User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roman Zippel , roms@lpg.ticalc.org Subject: Re: RFT - gconfig fix References: <20050726120841.GA27366@mars.ravnborg.org> In-Reply-To: <20050726120841.GA27366@mars.ravnborg.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Joachim - any specific reason why you ifdeffed out usage of stock Gtk icons? Only to have a consistent look between xconfig and gconfig. A better way would perhaps be to use stock KDE and GNOME icons, but I never had the time to make a fix for xconfig so I made this compromise instead to let you guys chose/code for me. Personally I prefer the in-kernel icons though... Regards /Jocke -- Joachim Nilsson :: +46(0)21-123348 ::