From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DxRyZ-0004Jl-K0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:08:16 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DxRyV-0004IP-VG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:08:14 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DxRyV-0003x0-HB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:08:11 -0400 Received: from [62.89.75.144] (helo=bozon2.softax.com.pl) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1DxRpF-0005lY-ES for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:58:37 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bozon2.softax.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2979FDC085 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:47:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bozon2.softax.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bozon2.softax.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03067-19 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:47:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [16.193.144.98] (unknown [16.193.144.98]) by bozon2.softax.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B84ADC02E for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:47:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E65C61.9030000@softax.com.pl> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:53:05 +0200 From: Sebastian Kaliszewski MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Unknown symbol __PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC References: <1122352134.13708.4.camel@unixadmindazfc2.chh.co.nz> <1122376251.4987.2.camel@darrylsfc3box> In-Reply-To: <1122376251.4987.2.camel@darrylsfc3box> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hello! Darryl Dixon wrote: > Well, I can confirm that this works OK. > > Also, congrats Fabrice, this version of kqemu appears to work OK with > Win 9x (I booted my Win98SE machine), and the games that I use QEMU to > run (AoE2, Civ3, Baldurs Gate 2) all were noticeably quicker. The > speedup didn't seem to be as dramatic as WinXP with/without kqemu, but > it was definitely there. > > Cheers, > D > > > On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 07:56 +0200, Pascal Terjan wrote: > >>On 7/26/05, Darryl Dixon > wrote: >>> Hi All, Fabrice, >>> >>> Compiling the new kqemu-0.7.1 on Fedora Core 4 with kernel >>> 2.6.12-1.1398_FC4 gives this error: >>> >>> -------------8<------------------- >>> [dixond@unixadmindazfc2 kqemu]$ make >>> make -C /lib/modules/2.6.12-1.1398_FC4/build M=`pwd` modules >>> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.12-1.1398_FC4-i686' >>> CC [M] /opt/src/qemu-0.7.1/kqemu/kqemu-linux.o >>> cp /opt/src/qemu-0.7.1/kqemu/kqemu-mod-i386.o /opt/src/qemu-0.7.1/kqemu/kqemu-mod.o >>> LD [M] /opt/src/qemu-0.7.1/kqemu/kqemu.o >>> Building modules, stage 2. >>> MODPOST >>> Warning: could not find /opt/src/qemu-0.7.1/kqemu/.kqemu-mod.o.cmd >>> for /opt/src/qemu-0.7.1/kqemu/kqemu-mod.o >>> *** Warning: "__PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC" [/opt/src/qemu-0.7.1/kqemu/kqemu.ko] >>> undefined! >>> CC /opt/src/qemu-0.7.1/kqemu/kqemu.mod.o >>> LD [M] /opt/src/qemu-0.7.1/kqemu/kqemu.ko >>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.12-1.1398_FC4-i686' Had exactly the same problem the proposed patch seems to fix it. rgds Sebastian