From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Florian_G=F6dden?= <florian.goedden@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: veth0 problems and network-route
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:04:58 +0200
Message-ID: <42E9649A.8070400@gmx.de>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.40.0507281743380.25780-100000@omicron.cse.ohio-state.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.40.0507281743380.25780-100000@omicron.cse.ohio-state.edu>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

wei huang wrote:

>xen-br0 is created and vif0.0 and veth0 is attached to
>it. 
>
Is veth0 really attached to the bridge? If i am right that will produce 
a loop. Or do you mean eth0 instead of veth0?

MfG

Florian