From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Antonino A. Daplas" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1 2.6.13-rc4] framebuffer: new driver for cyberblade/i1 core Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 19:51:41 +0800 Message-ID: <42ECBB4D.6020306@gmail.com> References: <42ECA05F.40401@t-online.de> Reply-To: linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DzCNl-0005tz-P2 for linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 04:53:29 -0700 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.195]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1DzCNl-0006Vk-5T for linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 04:53:30 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i3so870936wra for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 04:53:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <42ECA05F.40401@t-online.de> Sender: linux-fbdev-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: linux-fbdev-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Knut Petersen Knut Petersen wrote: > Currently tridenfb claims to support the cyberblade/i1 graphics core. > This is of very limited truth. There is a great number of bugs, even > vesafb is faster and provides more working modes and much better > quality of the video signal. > > Tridentfb seems to be unmaintained,and documentation for most of the > supported chips is not available. Fixing cyberblade/i1 support inside > of tridentfb was not an option, it would have caused numerous > if(CYBERBLADEi1) else ... cases and would have rendered the code > to be almost unmaintainable. > > This code does support the graphics core of a single north bridge > and has been tested and developed on a system equipped with that > chip. It cannot break anything but the broken cyberblade/i1 support > of tridentfb, and even if that would be the case, there is still > vesafb as a working alternative. On the other hand it provides > significant improvements. Because of this I believe that there is > no reason to keep it out of 2.6.13 just because it is presented a > bit late in the development cycle. > > > Signed-off-by: Knut Petersen > > diff -urN linux-2.6.13-rc4/Documentation/fb/cyblafb.txt > linux-2.6.13-rc4-tfix/Documentation/fb/cyblafb.txt > --- linux-2.6.13-rc4/Documentation/fb/cyblafb.txt 1970-01-01 > 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 > +++ linux-2.6.13-rc4-tfix/Documentation/fb/cyblafb.txt 2005-07-31 > 09:38:44.000000000 +0200 > @@ -0,0 +1,354 @@ > +CyBlaFB is a framebuffer driver for the Cyberblade/i1 graphics core > integrated > +into the VIA Apollo PLE133 (aka vt8601) south bridge. It is developed and > +tested using a VIA EPIA 5000 board. Nice docs :-) > + > config FB_TRIDENT > tristate "Trident support" > depends on FB && PCI > @@ -1193,8 +1219,12 @@ > but also on some motherboards. For more information, read > > > + Attention: Cyberblade/i1 support has been removed, choose the > + cyblafb driver instead. > + Is it really necessary to remove it from tridentfb so soon? Maybe you can add a warning first, then remove it after a few development cycles. > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include