From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [PATCH] Console Daemon Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 12:49:33 -0500 Message-ID: <42EFB22D.5000808@us.ibm.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Pratt Cc: xen-devel , Rusty Russell , Ian Pratt , Christian Limpach , Robert Read List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ian Pratt wrote: >>Does this seem agreeable? >> >> > >Having 'history' when you reconnect seems a bit over the top -- I'd make >this a 'phase 2' thing. > >However, having a parameter which indicates the amount of history that >will be logged to disk might be useful. (whenever the file reaches size >X, throw away the first 20%.) > > Ah, I see, I wasn't following what the disk logging was for. Makes perfect sense now. >We definitely need xenstore support for registering watchers for items >that don't exist yet. Having to poll is daft. > > Rusty implemented support for this already. Hopefully Christian can pull it soon so we can cleanup the balloon and console stuff to just watch non-existant nodes :-) Regards, Anthony Liguori >Ian > > >