From: Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB and PRIO qdiscs introducing extra latency when output
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 19:32:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42F11BDA.8070501@dsl.pipex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1122460110.8454.11.camel@pgala.it.nuigalway.ie>
Andy Furniss wrote:
> Jonathan Lynch wrote:
>> If the ceil is based at IP level then the max ceil is going to be a
>> value between 54 Mbit and 97 Mbit (not the tc values) for a 100 Mbit
>> interface depending on the size of the packets passing through, right ?
>>
>> Minimum Ethernet frame
>> 148,809 * (46 * 8) = 148,809 * 368 = 54,761,712 Mbps
>>
>> Maximum Ethernet frame
>> 8,127 * (1500 * 8) = 8,127 * 12,000 = 97,524,000 Mbps
>
>
> If you use the overhead option I think you will be to overcome this
> limitation and push the rates closer to 100mbit.
I looked up ethernet overheads and found the figure of 38 bytes per
frame, the 46 is min eth payload size? and looking at the way mpu is
handled by the tc rate table generator I think you would need to use 46
+ 38 as mpu.
So on every htb line that has a rate put ..... overhead 38 mpu 84
I haven't checked those figures or tested close to limits though, the
12k burst would need increasing a bit aswell or that will slightly over
limit rate at HZ\x1000.
Andy.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-03 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-27 10:28 [LARTC] HTB and PRIO qdiscs introducing extra latency when Jonathan Lynch
2005-07-27 13:25 ` [LARTC] HTB and PRIO qdiscs introducing extra latency when output Andy Furniss
2005-07-27 15:37 ` Jonathan Lynch
2005-07-27 21:53 ` Andy Furniss
2005-07-28 16:37 ` Jonathan Lynch
2005-07-28 21:49 ` Andy Furniss
2005-08-02 20:59 ` Jonathan Lynch
2005-08-03 14:04 ` Andy Furniss
2005-08-03 19:32 ` Andy Furniss [this message]
2005-08-04 18:06 ` Andy Furniss
2005-10-19 10:59 ` Andy Furniss
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-10 18:37 Jonathan Lynch
2005-08-11 16:36 ` Andy Furniss
2005-08-20 20:51 Jonathan Lynch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42F11BDA.8070501@dsl.pipex.com \
--to=andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.