From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: console problem Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 13:47:56 -0500 Message-ID: <42F505DC.1010305@us.ibm.com> References: <59D45D057E9702469E5775CBB56411F11DA70A@pdsmsx406> <2ed604b71e1c47ac7aeaab9119b9cae9@cl.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2ed604b71e1c47ac7aeaab9119b9cae9@cl.cam.ac.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: "Li, Xin B" , Stefan Berger , David F Barrera , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Li Ge , xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Keir Fraser wrote: > > On 6 Aug 2005, at 06:45, Li, Xin B wrote: > >>> as you are rewriting consoled, how about renaming it (for ex, >>> to xenconsoled) ? >>> >>> now we have xenblkd, xend, xenstored, so if all the xen-related >>> processes have xen as prefix (which is a good thing), we can see what >>> is running by just one command "ps|grep xen" :-) >> > > I'm considerign renaming to xenconsd and xencons (instead of consoled > and xc_console). The rename is probably best done directly on our > repository, rather than waiting for a trivial but noisy patch. Would be nice to make it xenconsoled and xenconsole. It's just three extra letters and it makes what they are significantly more obvious. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Any dissent? :-) > > -- Keir > >