From: Keenan Pepper <keenanpepper@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: synchronize_rcu vs. rcu_barrier
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 16:26:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42F66E81.2020807@gmail.com> (raw)
What's the difference between synchronize_rcu() and rcu_barrier() (new function
used only by reiser4 code)? From the scant documentation it seems like they do
the same thing.
Keenan
next reply other threads:[~2005-08-07 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-07 20:26 Keenan Pepper [this message]
2005-08-07 21:52 ` synchronize_rcu vs. rcu_barrier Keenan Pepper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42F66E81.2020807@gmail.com \
--to=keenanpepper@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.