From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: reiser4 performance
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 11:10:34 -0700
Message-ID: <42F7A01A.7090209@namesys.com>
References: <dd7cbn$kbg$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-25349-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <dd7cbn$kbg$1@sea.gmane.org>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Hemiplegic Menehune <Hemiplegic.Menehune@gmail.com>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

I should add that fsync performance has not been worked on yet, which is
surely why postgres performance is poor.

Hans

Hemiplegic Menehune wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I just wanted to say thank you for putting together reiser4 :)
>
>I just upgraded to the latest -mm kernel on my box and my jaw is on the 
>floor looking at the performance of reiser4. I have previously played around 
>with it on a few occasions, but I never had the chance to test it with my 
>software before - it is literally 3 times as fast as reiserfs3 (which itself 
>is twice as fast as ext3) - how did you guys do it? :)
>
>The only thing reiser4 runs slower than ext3 is postgresql!
>
>Its already as stable as any other fs on my systems and recovers better than 
>most when my battery runs out. Any idea when it will make it into the stable 
>2.6 kernel?
>
>- HM
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>